CIA.DCAT
Dynamic Capital Adequacy Testing is a stress-testing technique. It is a critical tool for OSFI in assessing the financial condition of an insurer. Poor DCAT results will cause OSFI to intervene. Forum
Contents
Pop Quiz
Consider this important question: Based on a DCAT analysis involving base & adverse scenarios, when can the AA report that an insurer is in good financial condition?
Answer:
- for the BASE scenario: must have MCT > 150% (all years in forecast period)
- for the BASE scenario & all PAS: must have A > L (all years in forecast period)
- (Note that PAS = Plausible Adverse Scenarios, A = Assets, L = Liabilities)
Now, here's the Pop Quiz:
- (a) Given the following, can the AA report that the insurer is in good financial condition?
Scenario Component 2018 2019 Base Scenario MCT Ratio 195% 170% Capital (A-L) 300m 250m Adverse Scenario: Earthquake MCT Ratio 195% 145% Capital (A-L) 300m 225m
- (b) Given the following, can the AA report that the insurer is in good financial condition?
Scenario Component 2018 2019 Base Scenario MCT Ratio 195% 170% Capital (A-L) 300m 250m Adverse Scenario: High Inflation MCT Ratio 195% 145% Capital (A-L) 300m -10m
Note: This pop quiz is very similar to E 2016.Fall #19b
BattlePlan
Based on past exams, the main things you need to know (in rough order of importance) are:
- adverse scenario: examples, ripple effects management actions
- evaluating the financial condition of an insurer
- how to select a PAS (Plausible Adverse Scenario)
- steps in the DCAT process (especially the base scenario)
- definition of reverse stress-testing
- definition of social inflation
reference part (a) part (b) part (c) part (d) E (2018.Spring #19) define:
- Plausible Adverse Scenarioadverse scenario:
- propose & justify 2adverse scenario:
- ripple effects 2financial condition:
- evaluateE (2018.Spring #24) SCENARIO:
- identify AA errors 3E (2017.Fall #22) financial condition:
- evaluatedefine:
- social inflationadverse scenario:
- off-B/S riskE (2017.Fall #23) define:
- Plausible Adverse Scenarioadverse scenario:
- premium volumeE (2017.Spring #21) PAS:
- how to selectE (2016.Fall #19) DCAT process:
- base scenariofinancial condition:
- evaluateadverse scenario:
- frequency & severityadverse scenario:
- policy liabilities misestimationE (2016.Spring #21) base scenario:
- identifyadverse scenario:
- exampleadverse scenario:
- impact on MCT ratioadverse scenario:
- management actionsE (2015.Fall #20) PAS:
- how to selectadverse scenario:
- ripple effectsadverse scenario:
- management actionsfinancial condition:
- comment (see OSFI.MCT)E (2015.Spring #29) financial condition:
- evaluateadverse scenario:
- variousdefinition & examples:
- social inflationE (2014.Fall #26) define:
- reverse stress-testingE (2014.Spring #25) DCAT filing:
- actuary's actionsDCAT base scenario:
- cash injectionDCAT PAS:
- cash injectionE (2014.Spring #27) define:
- reverse stress-testingE (2014.Spring #28) financial condition: 1
- evaluateadverse scenario:
- OSFI interventionadverse scenario:
- premium riskadverse scenario:
- frequency & severityE (2013.Fall #29) DCAT process:
- base scenariofinancial condition:
- evaluateadverse scenario:
- premium riskadverse scenario:
- policy liabilities riskE (2012.Fall #29) financial condition:
- evaluate
- 1 This problem relies on an invalid assumption.
- 2 This is a GREAT PROBLEM. Make sure you study it thoroughly. It comes up in Risk Categories section of this wiki article at the end of mini BattleQuiz 6
- 3 This is a good Bloom's Taxonomy problem for learning the DCAT process. It's listed under mini BattleQuiz 7 under old exam problems, but it relates closely to the DCAT "method" discussed here.
In Plain English!
Overall Comments
The old exam questions on DCAT are interesting! They often involve interpreting data related to an adverse scenario. Sometimes you also have to recalculate the MCT ratio for the adverse scenario.
- Super-Secret Hint: The MCT ratio for the adverse scenario is usually lower than for the base scenario!
This paper is quite long at 46 pages, but you can ignore a big section in the middle (Appendix A: pages 21-33) because it relates to life insurance. The most important definition in this paper is for Plausible Adverse Scenario or PAS for short. The pop quiz above used earthquake and high inflation as examples of a PAS.
Plausible Adverse Scenario: a set of assumptions for an undesirable but reasonably possible event relating to insurer's financial condition
But what do undesirable and reasonably possible mean:
undesirable > 95th percentile on the loss distribution reasonably possible < 99th percentile on the loss distribution
Putting these terms together means that a PAS should lie between the 95th and 99th on the loss distribution. You can see from the BattleTable above that a very common type of exam question follows this pattern:
- identify an PAS
- identify ripple effects
- identify management actions
The information you need to answer this type of question is in Appendix B - Risk Categories. (Discussed later in this wiki article.)
Sections 1,2: Intro & Method
Here, we answer 2 basic questions:
Question 1: why do we do stress-testing [Hint: risk-complement-Cap-Liq
- risk: risk identification & control (stress-testing helps identify and control risk)
- complement: stress-testing complements other risk management tools such as Best's Capital Adequacy Ratio as described in BCAR.Cat (may also involve simulation of shocks like earthquakes)
- Cap: stress-testing supports capital management
- Liq: stress-testing improves liquidity management
- This question has been asked on several recent exams: (2016.Fall #20b), (2013.Fall #13a), (2012.Fall #28a) In the BattleCards, these exam references are listed with the OSFI.Stress reading. (There is significant overlap between CIA.DCAT and OSFI.Stress)
mini BattleQuiz 1 You must be logged in or this will not work.
Question 2: how do we do stress-testing
- review: REVIEW 3 years operations & financial position @ end of each year
- BASE: create the BASE scenario - a set of assumptions on risk factors that are CONSISTENT with business plan (if plan is realistic & consistent) OVER forecast period. See (2016.Fall #19a), (2013.Fall #29a)
- risk: RISK CATEGORIES - select relevant risk categories from F-PIP-RIGOR using sensitivity-testing (F-PIP-RIGOR is a memory trick for remembering P&C insurer risk categories, and is discussed later in this article)
- PAS: select plausible adverse scenarios from the risk categories identified in step 3 (make sure to also consider ripple effects – discussed in the next section)
- report: REPORT scenarios with highest surplus sensitivity & those where surplus < (supervisery capital required)
- Action(mgmt): identify management action to facilitate risk mitigation & contingency planning
- Action(regulator): identify possible regulatory action for falling below regulatory capital required (& SIGN opinion)
If you think about these steps, they really are just common sense:
- (Steps 1,2): Before doing anything, you have to understand the state of your company. This is why you review operations and create a BASE scenario.
- (Steps 3,4,5): Then you look at company-specific risks, create a few adverse scenarios (with ripple effects), and write a report
- (Steps 6,7): Finally, management uses the report to take action to mitigate the risks. (If the analysis shows bad results, you may need to consider what to do in the case of regulatory action.)
And, as stated above, A.M. Best also provides a different stress-testing methodology in their paper on Catastrophe Analysis. See BCAR.Cat.
mini BattleQuiz 2 You must be logged in or this will not work.
Miscellaneous Items
Other things from Sections 1,2 are concepts relating to the forecast period, base scenario, and plausible adverse scenarios. These are covered in the BattleCards. This next mini BattleQuiz has exam questions that have been asked more than once. There are 2 terms related to Plausible Adverse Scenario that deserve special mention:
ripple effect an event that occurs WHEN an adverse scenario triggers a change in 1 or more independent assumptions Example: a ripple effect of an earthquake may be loss of reinsurance management action actions that management may take to mitigate adverse ripple effects Example: management may seek alternate reinsurance arrangements
mini BattleQuiz 3 You must be logged in or this will not work.
Section 3: Modeling
Purpose
The purpose of any model is to portray, on a simplified level, a process occurring in the real world. A DCAT model must reproduce these 3 key elements of the Financial Statements:
- B/S(A, L, R/E): Balance Sheet items - Assets, Liabilities, Retained Earnings
- I/S (revenue, expenses): Income Statement items - revenue, expenses
- regulatory measures of capital adequacy: MCT ratio
Model Validation
Once you have a model that outputs these elements, you need to verify that the outputs make sense. This is model validation.
- mini Pop Quiz: Given Cash on Hand for the base scenario of models 1 & 2, which model is more likely to be valid?
Model Latest Year Projection Year 1 Projection Year 2 Projection Year 3 Model 1 - Base Scenario (Cash) 20,000 20,800 21,600 22,400 Model 2 - Base Scenario (Cash) 20,000 18,225 23,125 15,800
- Answer: Model 1. You can see that the cash in Model 1 is smoothly increasing whereas in Model 2, it is erratic. So, the first thing to look for when validating a model is whether the base scenario exhibits continuity of results from year to year. (This, and other validation items, are contained in the BattleCards.)
- This example is somewhat similar to E (2016.Spring #21)
mini BattleQuiz 4 You must be logged in or this will not work.
Other Modeling Topics
Section 3 in the DCAT paper also covers the topics listed below, but they aren't likely exam questions so we'll skip over them for now. If you want to, you can cover them in Level 3: Custom Battles. (That's from the BattlePlan page in the main part of the BattleActs site.)
- stochastic versus deterministic models
- how to model ripple effects
- considerations in model segmentation.
Section 4: Reporting
Alice the Actuary stayed up all night writing her DCAT report.
Question: why did she bother??!!
- Because her mean boss told her to.
- Also, because that's how the actuary communicates the state of the company (as well as other information) to the Board of Directors.
- The "other information" could include risks the company faces as well as ways to reduce that risk.
Readers of the report may also include management and regulators, but they would get a more detailed statistical report than the Board of Directors.
mini BattleQuiz 5 You must be logged in or this will not work.
Appendix B: Risk Categories
What is F-PIP-RIGOR?
- F-PIP-RIGOR is my memory trick for remembering the 9 P&C risk categories from Appendix B:
F - P I P - R I G O R Frequency & Severity - Policy Liabilities Inflation Premiums - Reinsurance & Counter-parties Investment risk Government risk Off-B/S risk Related Company risk
- Each of these categories can be used to construct various adverse scenarios. But not all categories will be relevant in all situations. You must use judgment to assess which are most appropriate. The DCAT paper discusses each in detail. In the next section, I'm going to explain how I summarized that discussion.
Example 1: The first 'F'
- F = Frequency & Severity Risk. There are 3 important items related to each risk category:
- causes: a change in frequency & severity can be caused by...
- catastrophe
- social inflation
- ripple effects: these may include...
- post-event inflation
- loss of reinsurance
- management action: to mitigate the risk, management may decide to...
- raise rates
- review reinsurance
- causes: a change in frequency & severity can be caused by...
- This is the pattern for learning each of these categories.
Example 2: The 'I' in RIGOR
I = Investment Risk
- causes: a change in investment risk can be caused by...
- significant changes in the yield curve
- decrease in return on equity investments,...
- ripple effects: these may include...
- forced sale or liquidation
- significant +/- change in cash flows
- management actions: to mitigate the risk, management may decide to...
- sell assets
- change investment strategy
- causes: a change in investment risk can be caused by...
Tricks for Memorizing F-PIP-RIGOR
It's a big job to memorize causes, ripple effects, and mgmt actions for all 9 risk categories, but there are a few tricks:
- Trick 1: Instead of memorizing the ripple effects for each risk category individually, just memorize some of the common ripple effects. These are:
higher LR (due to higher losses or operating costs) loss of reinsurance post-event inflation forced sale or liquidation mix shift Policyholder actions regulatory action
- If you're then asked for a ripple effect for a particular adverse scenario, you can take an educated guess and pick a couple of things from this list that seem most appropriate. (2013.Fall #19d)
- Trick 2: Do the same thing for management actions. Here are some common management actions:
tighten U/W raise rates review reinsurance sell assets review mix (geography, limit,...)
- If you're then asked for management actions for a particular adverse scenario, take an educated guess from this list! (2013.Fall #19c)
mini BattleQuiz 6 You must be logged in or this will not work.
2018.Spring Q24 (A Good Bloom's Q)
This question concerns the how of stress-testing that we discussed above in terms of a 7-step method. It is a long question for only 3 points. At 3.25 minutes-per-point, you have roughly 10 minutes to do it, but I think it may take you longer than that. The first step is understanding what you have to do. This information is given in the first paragraph:
- identify 4 incorrect actions by the AA
- describe the correct actions
Make sure you do both of the above items. The second step in this problem is making sense of the given information, and you have 2 choices: You can either highlight the relevant information as you read it. (You brought a highlighter to the exam, right?) Or you can make bullet points for each paragraph. I made bullet point notes as shown below. The text in red & green font was added after I made the paragraph notes. Red indicates an incorrect AA action. Green indicates the corrected action. (Note that I used abbreviations to save time.)
- para 2:
- - opns begin 2012
- - current yr-end: 12/31/2017
- - AA analysis: July 2018
- - bus. plan uses results through 12/31/2017
- para 3:
- - AA reviews opns in 2017 (1yr) → should review ≥ 3 yrs
- - prepares base scen (uses bus. plan)
- - forecast period: 12/31/17 to 12/31/19 (2 yrs) → forecast period should be ≥ 3 yrs
- - reduces prem. growth assumptions
- - MCT > 150%
- para 4:
- - review risk categories
- - test change in risk factors to get surplus < 0
- - adjust risk factors to get 95-99% prob. for adv. scen.
- - discard reins. risk & off-B/S risk
- para 5:
- - rank scen. by MCT (low to high)
- para 6:
- - select 3 scen. for more analysis → all with MCT < 150% should be further analyzed
- - consider: interactions, ripple, macro-eco, mgmt actions → should also consider regulator action due to low MCT
- para 7:
- - AA writes DCAT rpt with all sections
- - explains bus. plan deviation in base scen. (lower prem. growth)
- - concludes fin. cond. not satis. (cat event MCAT < 150%)
I've noted 4 items above but there are more. See if you can find them. Check your answers with the examiner's report.
Final Words
The best way to learn this paper is to work on the old exam problems at the same time you're learning the BattleCards. The final mini BattleQuiz for this article just contains a bunch of old exam problems.
mini BattleQuiz 7 You must be logged in or this will not work.
BattleCodes
Memorize:
- conditions that must be satisfied by the DCAT analysis for Alice the Actuary to report that an insurer is in good financial condition.
- 4 purposes of stress-testing: rsk.compl.C.L
- 7 steps in stress-testing: rBrPr.Act(MR)
- defns plausible adverse scenario, reverse stress-testing, ripple effects
- The 9 P&C risk categories F-PIP-RIGOR
- common examples of ripple effects (7) & management actions (5)
Conceptual:
- Explain how the 7 steps of the stress-testing methodology are just common sense.
- How is this paper, CIA.DCAT, similar to the related paper OSFI.Stress? In what ways are these papers different? (Note that I haven't answered that question in this article. It's something for you to think about after you've covered OSFI.Stress.)
- What other papers are related to CIA.DCAT? How about OSFI.MCT, the #1 ranked paper on the syllabus.
- A Bloom's Taxonomy Question: What extra detail does a DCAT analysis provide that the MCT ratio alone does not?
- See also BCAR.Cat:
- It's a U.S.-specific reading, but it's interesting to compare and contrast the BCAR stress-test methodology (which has 5 steps) to the 7 steps of the DCAT methodology.
- (Note that the 5 steps of the BCAR methodology has been asked more than once on past exams, so make sure you learn it when you get to that paper!)
Calculational:
- Many DCAT problems from past exams are more like case studies than calculation problems. (2016.Fall #19)
- You may be presented with MCT ratios and other balance sheet metrics for a base scenario & several adverse scenarios.
- A typical question is whether the insurer is in good financial condition, and to identify possible ripple effects & appropriate management actions.
- Sometimes a DCAT problem is combined with an MCT problem. (2017.Spring #21), (2016.Spring #21), (2015.Fall #20).
- Expect about 2 pts from this paper on the exam. This may seem low, but it's important because DCAT often underlies a high-value MCT problem.
Full BattleQuiz You must be logged in or this will not work.
POP QUIZ ANSWERS
(a) YES. All conditions are satisfied. (The MCT ratio of 145% for the adverse scenario in 2019 doesn't matter.) (b) NO. The adverse scenario has A-L = -10m < 0 in 2019, which is not allowed.
(It always seemed a bit STRANGE to me that the MCT ratio for the adverse scenario isn't relevant to the appointed actuary's decision! But whatever...)