Difference between revisions of "MSA.Ratios"
(→All About the Ratios) |
|||
(40 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | '''Reading''': MSA Legend of P&C KPI’s and Descriptions | |
− | ''' | + | '''Authour''': Market-Security Analysis & Research Inc. |
− | :{| class='wikitable' | + | [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/vanillaforum/categories/msa-ratios<span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: lightgrey; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 0px;">'''Forum'''</span>] |
+ | |||
+ | {| class='wikitable' style='background-color: navajowhite; | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | '' | + | || '''BA Quick-Summary''': <span style="color: green;>'''MSA Ratios'''</span> |
− | + | ||
+ | MSA Ratios are used to '''evaluate the financial health''' of Canadian property and casualty (P&C) insurance companies. | ||
− | + | These ratios help regulators and stakeholders assess the '''financial stability''' and '''operational efficiency''' of P&C insurance companies in Canada. Examples or MSA Ratios include: | |
− | + | * MCT Ratio (Minimum Capital Test Ratio) | |
+ | * Premium-to-Surplus Ratio | ||
+ | * Return-on-Equity (ROE) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |} | ||
==Pop Quiz== | ==Pop Quiz== | ||
Line 21: | Line 28: | ||
# overall diversification score | # overall diversification score | ||
# maximum possible diversification score | # maximum possible diversification score | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Study Tips== | ||
+ | |||
+ | This reading is just formulas covering the calculation & interpretation of key financial metrics. There isn't too much to memorize aside from the formulas and there are lots of old exam problems to practice with. | ||
+ | |||
+ | These ratios are used to assess the financial health of an insurer and can be used in conjunction with other assessment tools like FCT (Financial Condition Test) and ORSA (Own Risk Solvency Assessment). | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Estimated study time''': several days ''(not including subsequent review time)'' | ||
==BattleTable== | ==BattleTable== | ||
Line 33: | Line 48: | ||
{| class='wikitable' | {| class='wikitable' | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | Questions held out from | + | | Questions held out from Fall 2019 exam: '''#23'''. ''(Skip these now to have a fresh exam to practice on later. For links to these questions, see [[Exam Summaries]].)'' |
|} | |} | ||
Line 43: | Line 58: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|| [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2019_1-Spring)/(2019_1-Spring)_(21)_v2.pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style="color: red;">'''(2019.Spring #21)'''</span> | || [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2019_1-Spring)/(2019_1-Spring)_(21)_v2.pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style="color: red;">'''(2019.Spring #21)'''</span> | ||
− | || <span style='color: green;'>'''ROE, | + | || <span style='color: green;'>'''ROE, ROA, leverage:'''</span> <br> - calculate <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>4</sup>'''</span> |
|| <span style='color: blue;'>'''financial health:'''</span> <br> - evaluate | || <span style='color: blue;'>'''financial health:'''</span> <br> - evaluate | ||
|| '''UCAE recoverable''': <br> - calculate | || '''UCAE recoverable''': <br> - calculate | ||
Line 51: | Line 66: | ||
|| [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2018_2-Fall)/(2018_2-Fall)_(24).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2018.Fall #24)'''</span> | || [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2018_2-Fall)/(2018_2-Fall)_(24).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2018.Fall #24)'''</span> | ||
|| '''various calcs''': <br> → [[CCIR.ARinstr]], [[OSFI.MCT]] | || '''various calcs''': <br> → [[CCIR.ARinstr]], [[OSFI.MCT]] | ||
− | || <span style='color: green;'>'''ROE, ROR, NLR/Eq, levg:'''</span> <br> - calculate | + | || <span style='color: green;'>'''ROE, ROR, NLR/Eq, levg:'''</span> <br> - calculate <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>5</sup>'''</span> |
|| <span style='color: blue;'>'''financial health:'''</span> <br> - evaluate | || <span style='color: blue;'>'''financial health:'''</span> <br> - evaluate | ||
| style="background-color: lightgrey" | | | style="background-color: lightgrey" | | ||
Line 57: | Line 72: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|| [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2018_1-Spring)/(2018_1-Spring)_(21).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style="color: red;">'''(2018.Spring #21)'''</span> | || [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2018_1-Spring)/(2018_1-Spring)_(21).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style="color: red;">'''(2018.Spring #21)'''</span> | ||
− | || <span style='color: green;'>'''ROE, | + | || <span style='color: green;'>'''ROE, ROA, leverage:'''</span> <br> - calculate |
|| <span style='color: blue;'>'''financial health:'''</span> <br> - evaluate | || <span style='color: blue;'>'''financial health:'''</span> <br> - evaluate | ||
| style="background-color: lightgrey" | | | style="background-color: lightgrey" | | ||
Line 71: | Line 86: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|| [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2017_1-Spring)/(2017_1-Spring)_(13).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2017.Spring #13)'''</span> | || [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2017_1-Spring)/(2017_1-Spring)_(13).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2017.Spring #13)'''</span> | ||
− | || <span style='color: green;'>'''ROE, | + | || <span style='color: green;'>'''ROE, ROA, leverage:'''</span> <br> - calculate <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>2a,4</sup>'''</span> |
|| <span style='color: blue;'>'''financial health:'''</span> <br> - evaluate | || <span style='color: blue;'>'''financial health:'''</span> <br> - evaluate | ||
|| '''UCAE recoverable''': <br> - calculate <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>2c</sup>'''</span> | || '''UCAE recoverable''': <br> - calculate <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>2c</sup>'''</span> | ||
Line 130: | Line 145: | ||
: <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>2a</sup>'''</span> There is an error in the examiner's report solution to part (a). Their final answer for Net Income is correct but they did not include the 2,500 for total taxes in the intermediate step in that calculation. | : <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>2a</sup>'''</span> There is an error in the examiner's report solution to part (a). Their final answer for Net Income is correct but they did not include the 2,500 for total taxes in the intermediate step in that calculation. | ||
: <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>2c</sup>'''</span> There is an error in the examiner's report solution to part (c). Their final answer for UCAE recoverable is correct but there are 2 incorrect intermediate steps. The value for ''Total Liabilities'' should be 75,000 ''(not 65,000)''. | : <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>2c</sup>'''</span> There is an error in the examiner's report solution to part (c). Their final answer for UCAE recoverable is correct but there are 2 incorrect intermediate steps. The value for ''Total Liabilities'' should be 75,000 ''(not 65,000)''. | ||
− | : <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>3</sup>'''</span> The interpretation of "Total Liabilities" in this problem is <u>inconsistent</u> with the interpretation in <span style='color: red;'>'''(2017.Spring #13c)'''</span>. See [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/vanillaforum/discussion/43/overall-net-leverage-ratio<span>''this forum post'' | + | : <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>3</sup>'''</span> The interpretation of "Total Liabilities" in this problem is <u>inconsistent</u> with the interpretation in <span style='color: red;'>'''(2017.Spring #13c)'''</span>. See [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/vanillaforum/discussion/43/overall-net-leverage-ratio<span>''this forum post''] for a detailed explanation. And here's [https://battleactsmain.ca/vanillaforum/discussion/1453/fall-2012-q21 ''another forum post''] on this topic. |
− | : <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>4</sup>'''</span> Parts (a),(b),(c) of <span style="color: red;">'''(2017.Spring #13)'''</span> & <span style="color: red;">'''(2019.Spring #21)'''</span> are exactly the same but with different numbers. <span style="color: | + | : <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>4</sup>'''</span> Parts (a),(b),(c) of <span style="color: red;">'''(2017.Spring #13)'''</span> & <span style="color: red;">'''(2019.Spring #21)'''</span> are exactly the same but with different numbers. |
+ | : <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>5</sup>'''</span> The examiner's report has an error in Part (b.ii). The final answer should be 12.1% (not 12.7%). | ||
==In Plain English!== | ==In Plain English!== | ||
Line 191: | Line 207: | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | <span id="SupplementaryMSA"></span> | ||
* <span style="color: red; font-weight: 700;">Supplementary Ratios</span> (9 ratios) | * <span style="color: red; font-weight: 700;">Supplementary Ratios</span> (9 ratios) | ||
Line 210: | Line 227: | ||
| '''chg(Eq)''' (change in equity) || n/a || EQ(yr = x) / EQ(yr = x-1) || lower value indicates lower ability to support growth | | '''chg(Eq)''' (change in equity) || n/a || EQ(yr = x) / EQ(yr = x-1) || lower value indicates lower ability to support growth | ||
− | |- style="text-align: center;" | + | |- style="text-align: center; background-color: lightgrey;" |
− | | | + | | || || || |
|- | |- | ||
Line 223: | Line 240: | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | '''2-yr COR''' (Combined Operating Ratio) || style="color: red; text-align: center;" | < 100% || see CCIR | + | | '''2-yr COR''' (Combined Operating Ratio) || style="color: red; text-align: center;" | < 100% || see ''[[CCIR.ARinstr#Other_Basic_Accounting_Formulas | Accounting Formulas]]'' for COR formula <br> ''(Just use 2 years instead of 1 year)'' || higher ratio indicates U/W loss |
|- style="background-color: #F4A460;" | |- style="background-color: #F4A460;" | ||
− | | '''Overall Diversification''' || style="color: green; text-align: center;" | > 65 || ( LOB diversity score ) x ( geographic diversity score )|| each factor is 1-10. | + | | '''Overall Diversification''' || style="color: green; text-align: center;" | > 65 || ( LOB diversity score ) x ( geographic diversity score )|| Score for each factor is from 1-10. A higher score is better because it indicates greater diversity which is a hedge against risk. |
|} | |} | ||
Line 245: | Line 262: | ||
Normally the problems on the MSA ratios are not too hard, <u>but</u> they threw in a '''twist''' on this one. I don't want to reproduce the given info here, so click [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2017_1-Spring)/(2017_1-Spring)_(13).pdf <span style="color: red;">'''(2017.Spring #13)'''</span>] for examiner's report. The answer is explained well, but I want to make a few comments. ''(See the end of this section for my own version of the solution to this problem.)'' | Normally the problems on the MSA ratios are not too hard, <u>but</u> they threw in a '''twist''' on this one. I don't want to reproduce the given info here, so click [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2017_1-Spring)/(2017_1-Spring)_(13).pdf <span style="color: red;">'''(2017.Spring #13)'''</span>] for examiner's report. The answer is explained well, but I want to make a few comments. ''(See the end of this section for my own version of the solution to this problem.)'' | ||
− | This problem is exactly the same as [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2019_1-Spring)/(2019_1-Spring)_(21)_v2.pdf <span style="color: red;">'''2019.Spring #21'''</span>] but with different numbers. | + | This problem is exactly the same as [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2019_1-Spring)/(2019_1-Spring)_(21)_v2.pdf <span style="color: red;">'''2019.Spring #21'''</span>] but with different numbers. |
− | |||
====Part (a).i==== | ====Part (a).i==== | ||
Line 260: | Line 276: | ||
:{| class="wikitable" | :{| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | '''Invested Assets''' = Cash + (Bonds & Debentures) + (Common Shares) + (Real Estate) | + | | '''Invested Assets''' = <span style="color: red;">Cash</span> + (Bonds & Debentures) + (Common Shares) + (Real Estate) |
|} | |} | ||
− | :: | + | :: ''(There is an error in the examiner's report solution. The <span style="color: red;">Cash</span> term is not part of invested assets. It should however still be included in the denominator of the InvYld formula. The error was corrected in the [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2019_1-Spring)/(2019_1-Spring)_(21)_v2.pdf <span style="color: red;">'''2019.Spring #21'''</span>].)'' |
+ | |||
:{| class="wikitable" | :{| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 274: | Line 291: | ||
You're asked to calculate '''ROE''' (Return on Equity). The first step is obviously to write out the formula '''ROE''' = ( NI.preTax - Tot.Tax ) / Eq | You're asked to calculate '''ROE''' (Return on Equity). The first step is obviously to write out the formula '''ROE''' = ( NI.preTax - Tot.Tax ) / Eq | ||
− | * You're directly given Tot.Tax = 2,500 and Eq = 30,000, but you have to know how to calculate '''NI.preTax''': ''( | + | * You're directly given Tot.Tax = 2,500 and Eq = 30,000, but you have to know how to calculate '''NI.preTax''': |
+ | : ''(Note that the formula for NI.preTax given in the examiner's report should have included a term for "Other Income" as shown in [[CCIR.ARinstr#Other_Basic_Accounting_Formulas CCIR.ARinstr#Other_Basic_Accounting_Formulas | CCIR.ARinstr - Other Basic Accounting Formulas]] but this problem doesn't provide a value for Other Income so we just have to assume it equals 0. Click for a more detailed [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/vanillaforum/discussion/489/other-income-component#latest forum discussion] on this.)'' | ||
:{| class="wikitable" | :{| class="wikitable" |
Latest revision as of 20:52, 24 September 2024
Reading: MSA Legend of P&C KPI’s and Descriptions
Authour: Market-Security Analysis & Research Inc.
BA Quick-Summary: MSA Ratios
MSA Ratios are used to evaluate the financial health of Canadian property and casualty (P&C) insurance companies. These ratios help regulators and stakeholders assess the financial stability and operational efficiency of P&C insurance companies in Canada. Examples or MSA Ratios include:
|
Contents
Pop Quiz
Given:
- Overall Diversification Score = ( LOB diversification score ) x ( geographic diversification score )
- LOB diversification score = 8 (on a scale of 1-10)
- geographic diversification score = 8 (on a scale of 1-10)
Calculate:
- overall diversification score
- maximum possible diversification score
Study Tips
This reading is just formulas covering the calculation & interpretation of key financial metrics. There isn't too much to memorize aside from the formulas and there are lots of old exam problems to practice with.
These ratios are used to assess the financial health of an insurer and can be used in conjunction with other assessment tools like FCT (Financial Condition Test) and ORSA (Own Risk Solvency Assessment).
Estimated study time: several days (not including subsequent review time)
BattleTable
Based on past exams, the main things you need to know (in rough order of importance) are:
- calculation of ROE, ROR, ROA, net U/W leverage, investment yield
- evaluating financial health of an insurer according to the acceptable range for each MSA ratio
- (other MSA ratios such as diversification score are asked less often)
- shortcomings of MSA ratios (insurer characteristics not captured in the MSA ratios)
Questions held out from Fall 2019 exam: #23. (Skip these now to have a fresh exam to practice on later. For links to these questions, see Exam Summaries.) |
reference part (a) part (b) part (c) part (d) E (2019.Spring #21) ROE, ROA, leverage:
- calculate 4financial health:
- evaluateUCAE recoverable:
- calculateE (2018.Fall #24) various calcs:
→ CCIR.ARinstr, OSFI.MCTROE, ROR, NLR/Eq, levg:
- calculate 5financial health:
- evaluateE (2018.Spring #21) ROE, ROA, leverage:
- calculatefinancial health:
- evaluateE (2017.Fall #25) ROE:
- calculateother MSA ratios:
- your choicefinancial health:
- evaluateE (2017.Spring #13) ROE, ROA, leverage:
- calculate 2a,4financial health:
- evaluateUCAE recoverable:
- calculate 2cE (2016.Fall #22) ROE, ROR, leverage:
- calculatefinancial health:
- evaluateE (2016.Spring #23) ROE, ROR, ROA:
- calculatefinancial health:
- evaluateE (2015.Fall #22) equity:
- calculate (CCIR.ARinstr)ROE, leverage, COR:
- calculatefinancial health:
- evaluateE (2015.Spring #26) non-liquid assets:
- calculate 1financial health:
- evaluateROE, ROR:
- compareE (2014.Fall #23) ROE, ROR, ROA:
- calculatefinancial health:
- evaluateE (2013.Fall #23) MSA shortcomings:
- items not capturedinvestment yield:
- calculatediversification score:
- explainE (2012.Fall #21) financial health:
- evaluateRO.NEP:
- calculateclaims/(total liabs):
- calculate 3
- 1 See the forum thread on equity versus adjusted equity
- 2a There is an error in the examiner's report solution to part (a). Their final answer for Net Income is correct but they did not include the 2,500 for total taxes in the intermediate step in that calculation.
- 2c There is an error in the examiner's report solution to part (c). Their final answer for UCAE recoverable is correct but there are 2 incorrect intermediate steps. The value for Total Liabilities should be 75,000 (not 65,000).
- 3 The interpretation of "Total Liabilities" in this problem is inconsistent with the interpretation in (2017.Spring #13c). See this forum post for a detailed explanation. And here's another forum post on this topic.
- 4 Parts (a),(b),(c) of (2017.Spring #13) & (2019.Spring #21) are exactly the same but with different numbers.
- 5 The examiner's report has an error in Part (b.ii). The final answer should be 12.1% (not 12.7%).
In Plain English!
Intro
MSA stands for Market Security Analysis. They are a Canadian-owned analytics firm focused on the Canadian insurance industry. In case you're curious, their website is located here
There are 4 broad questions from this reading that you may be asked: (In practice, however, most of these ratios do not appear on the exam.)
- What are the names of the MSA ratios?
- What are the acceptable ranges?
- What are the formulas for each ratio?
- What do they mean?
Note that a company can fail some of these ratios in a given year and still be considered healthy. This happens frequently. A more comprehensive analysis looks at trends in these ratios over several years.
Note also that there are important aspects of a company that these simple numerical tests simply cannot measure. (This is covered briefly in mini BattleQuiz 3) My favourite intangible but crucial aspect of a company is its prospects for growth and innovation. How can innovation be measured by a formula???!!!! Innovative companies have a constellation of practices to encourage curiosity, engagement, and creativity. When you get to Feldblum's paper on rating agencies Feld.RtAgs, he discusses something called interactive ratings. An interactive rating is a comprehensive analysis of a company to asses its ability to pay claims, a narrow goal. But that's the kind of in-depth analysis you would have to do if you wanted to assess a company's prospects for innovation. I hope when you guys are big-shot FCAS members, you'll give some thought to developing that sort of culture at wherever you work! Have fun with it!
All About the Ratios
Let's organize the information into 2 tables:
- Regulatory Early Warning Ratios (9 ratios)
Name of Ratio Acceptable Range Formula Meaning MCT (Minimum Capital Test) > 150% CapAv / minCapReq measure of capital adequacy ROE (Return on Equity) > 5.4% ( NI.preTax - TotTax ) / Eq sustainability of earnings (need a few years of ROE values) ROR (Return on Revenue) > 6.2% ( U/W.Inc - CapGains + InvInc + IncFrmSubs ) / GWP income relative to revenue-generating capacity ROA (Return on Assets, after tax) > 2.6% ( NI.preTax - TotTax ) / (2-yr avg of assets) efficiency measure for income-generation Ins RO.NEP (Ins Return on Net EP) > 4.0% ( U/W.Inc - CapGains + InvInc(from U/W.Inc ) / NEP core earning capacity Liab / LiqAss < 105% Liabilities / ( Liquid Assets ) liquidity measure Net.LsRsvs / Eq < 200% ( Net.Loss.Reserves ) / Eq high ratio could mean financial distress 1yrDevlpt / Eq > -10% ( 1 yr development ) / Eq adverse development could mean under-reserving Net.Levg (Net Leverage) < 500% ( Net.Liabilities + NWP ) / Eq stability measure (high ratio means excessive writing)
- Supplementary Ratios (9 ratios)
Name of Ratio Acceptable Range Formula Meaning AdjInvYld (Adjusted Investment Yield) n/a see below measures income and capital gains relative to assets chg(NWP) % (% change in NWP) n/a NWP(yr = x) / NWP(yr = x-1) growth measure - high value may indicate capital strain chg(GWP) % (% change in GWP) n/a GWP(yr = x) / GWP(yr = x-1) growth measure - high value may indicate capital strain chg(Eq) (change in equity) n/a EQ(yr = x) / EQ(yr = x-1) lower value indicates lower ability to support growth AOCI / Eq n/a AOCI relates to unrealized gains/losses ReIns.Recovs / Eq n/a high value indicates dependence on ReInsRs Net.U/W.Levg < 300% NWP / Eq higher ratio indicates capital strain 2-yr COR (Combined Operating Ratio) < 100% see Accounting Formulas for COR formula
(Just use 2 years instead of 1 year)higher ratio indicates U/W loss Overall Diversification > 65 ( LOB diversity score ) x ( geographic diversity score ) Score for each factor is from 1-10. A higher score is better because it indicates greater diversity which is a hedge against risk.
- AdjInvYld = 2 x ( Net.InvInc + OCI ) / ( Invested Assets [start of yr] + Invested Assets [end of yr] - Net.InvInc - OCI )
The first mini BattleQuiz provides easy versions of the basic MSA ratio calculations and 1 old exam problem to get you started. Master these before moving on.
Note that in the mini BattleQuiz below, some of the BattleCards are actually old exam questions. Click E in the left-hand column to open a PDF with the full exam question and answer.
mini BattleQuiz 1 You must be logged in or this will not work.
Explanation of 2017.Spring #13ab (Investment Yield, ROE)
Normally the problems on the MSA ratios are not too hard, but they threw in a twist on this one. I don't want to reproduce the given info here, so click (2017.Spring #13) for examiner's report. The answer is explained well, but I want to make a few comments. (See the end of this section for my own version of the solution to this problem.)
This problem is exactly the same as 2019.Spring #21 but with different numbers.
Part (a).i
You're asked to calculate InvYld (investment yield). The formula given in the CCIR Annual Statement instructions is slightly different from the formula for AdjInvYld given above because it doesn't include OCI (Other Comprehensive Income). If you didn't know this, it wouldn't have mattered because they don't give you OCI so you just assume it's 0 anyway. The correct formula is:
InvYld = 2 x Net.InvInc / ( Invested Assets [start of yr] + Invested Assets [end of yr] - Net.InvInc )
The twist is that they don't directly give you the values you need in the formula. You have to have a general understanding of the B/S beyond what's in this reading. In particular, you have to know two additional formulas:
Invested Assets = Cash + (Bonds & Debentures) + (Common Shares) + (Real Estate)
- (There is an error in the examiner's report solution. The Cash term is not part of invested assets. It should however still be included in the denominator of the InvYld formula. The error was corrected in the 2019.Spring #21.)
Net.InvInc = InvInc + (Realized Gains/Losses) - (Inv.Expenses)
If you know these additional formulas, it's easy. If you don't, you can take an educated guess and do the best you can.
Part (a).ii
You're asked to calculate ROE (Return on Equity). The first step is obviously to write out the formula ROE = ( NI.preTax - Tot.Tax ) / Eq
- You're directly given Tot.Tax = 2,500 and Eq = 30,000, but you have to know how to calculate NI.preTax:
- (Note that the formula for NI.preTax given in the examiner's report should have included a term for "Other Income" as shown in CCIR.ARinstr - Other Basic Accounting Formulas but this problem doesn't provide a value for Other Income so we just have to assume it equals 0. Click for a more detailed forum discussion on this.)
NI.preTax = ( NEP - net.CAE - TotAcq - GenExps ) + net.InvInc
- You already have Net.InvInc = 4,500 from part (a), but you must also recall that
NEP = NWP - chg(UEP)
- So, NEP = 44,000 - (-1,200) = 45,200 (because they give you chg(UEP) as a decrease, so you have to reverse the sign, which is confusing.)
- NI.preTax = 45,200 - 35,000 - 5,000 - 3,000 + 4,500 = 6,700
- (NI.preTax - Tot.Tax) = 4,200, which is the numerator in the ROE formula. (Note the error in examiner's report in the calculation of Net Income. The answer is correct, but they forgot to subtract the tax of 2,500 in their intermediate step.)
Finally, ROE = 4,200 / 30,000 = 14.0%
Here is my own version of the full solution to parts (a), (b), (c) and 4 similar practice problems:
- 4 Practice Problems similar to 2017.Spring #13 ← shout-out to K99 for finding an error in the solution to #1 and #2 (corrected on 2019-08-20)
Comparison to ROE Problems on Prior Exams
Let's compare the 2017.Spring ROE problem to these past ROE exam problems, which I think were easier:
You're asked to calculate the same thing, ROE, but you're given slightly different data.
- In 2017.Spring, you're given equity, but must calculate NI as an intermediate step.
- In those past problems, it's reversed: you're given NI, but must calculate equity as an intermediate step.
But calculating equity is usually easier.
- There are basically three ways to calculate equity. See Calculating Equity for the various formulas for equity. (See also the examiner's reports for solutions to these 3 problems.)
Learn these two versions of the ROE problem!!
mini BattleQuiz 2 You must be logged in or this will not work.
More Practice
Non-numerical questions: |
mini BattleQuiz 3 You must be logged in or this will not work.
Older exam questions: |
- Be sure to check the this forum post which highlights an inconsistency between the CAS solutions to:
- User comments:
- ineedcoffee (don't we all!) asked a very good question regarding calculating ROR and when realized gains have to be subtracted from investment income.
- jefor139 noted an issue with the answer in the examiner's report to E (2012.Fall #21b).
mini BattleQuiz 4 You must be logged in or this will not work.
BattleCodes
Memorize:
- The rows highlighted in the table.
Conceptual:
- Know the meaning of the ratios highlighted in the tables.
- Understand the two versions of the ROE problem explained in the previous section.
Calculational:
- Be able to calculate the highlighted ratios
- Practice on the old exam problems
Final Comments:
- If you're uneasy about ignoring the non-highlighted items, you can come back to them later in your study. (There was 0.5 pt question in (2013.Fall #23c) about interpreting the diversification score.)
- These MSA questions are normally an easy question because they are repetitive and you can get:
- 1/4 of the points just by writing down the formula
- 1/4 of the points just by writing down the acceptable range
- 1/4 of the points just knowing the meaning of the ratio
- Then just crank out the calculation as quickly as you can. If you get it wrong, the point deduction will be low.
- Note that (2015.Spring #26a) was what I think of as a math contest type of problem. It was interesting, but I think there is a low probability of another question like this appearing on the exam. (It also looked time-consuming). If you do see another problem like this, you should at least write out all the formulas you think might be appropriate. Get that partial credit!!!!
Full BattleQuiz You must be logged in or this will not work.
POP QUIZ ANSWERS
- overall diversification score = 8 x 8 = 64
- maximum possible diversification score = 10 x 10 = 100