Difference between revisions of "CIA.PrLiabs"

From Exam 6 Canada
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(BattlePlan)
(BattleTable)
 
(64 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
Given a discount rate of 5%, calculate '''APV(claims liabilities)''' for $10,000 of payments made during the 12-mth development period. ''(When calculating APV for <u>claims</u> liabilities, we assume payments are made in the <u>middle</u> of the year, so the discounting period for 12-mths would be 0.5 yrs)''
 
Given a discount rate of 5%, calculate '''APV(claims liabilities)''' for $10,000 of payments made during the 12-mth development period. ''(When calculating APV for <u>claims</u> liabilities, we assume payments are made in the <u>middle</u> of the year, so the discounting period for 12-mths would be 0.5 yrs)''
  
==BattlePlan==
+
==BattleTable==
  
 
Based on past exams, the '''main things''' you need to know ''(in rough order of importance)'' are:
 
Based on past exams, the '''main things''' you need to know ''(in rough order of importance)'' are:
  
* <span style='color: green;'>'''DPAE/PDR:'''</span> calculation ''(DPAE = Deferred Policy Acquisition Expense, PDR = Premium Deficiency Reserve)''
+
* <span style='color: green;'>'''DPAE/PDR:'''</span> calculation, interpretation ''(DPAE = Deferred Policy Acquisition Expense, PDR = Premium Deficiency Reserve)''
 
* <u>durations</u> of premium liabilities ''(usually part of a larger MCT problem)''
 
* <u>durations</u> of premium liabilities ''(usually part of a larger MCT problem)''
 
* <u>definition</u> of the DPAE asset
 
* <u>definition</u> of the DPAE asset
 
* <u>components</u> of the policy liabilities in connection with the UPR ''(Unearned Premium Reserve)''
 
* <u>components</u> of the policy liabilities in connection with the UPR ''(Unearned Premium Reserve)''
  
[https://www.battleactsmain.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=&prefix=CIA&suffix=PrLiabs&section=all&subSection=all&subsetFlag=TopQReading&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=0&select07=0&select08=0&select09=0<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: gold; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''Top Questions]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">''&larr; Questions you <u>absolutely</u> need to know!'' </span>
+
[https://battleactsmain.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=&prefix=CIA&suffix=PrLiabs&section=all&subSection=all&subsetFlag=TopQReading&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=0&select07=0&select08=0&select09=0<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: gold; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''Top Questions]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">''&larr; Questions you <u>absolutely</u> need to know!'' </span>
  
'''''Important''''': ''Questions from <u>2015.Spring and prior</u> are from the <u>old</u> premium liabilities reading.
+
'''''Important''''': ''Questions from <u>2015.Spring and prior</u> are <span style="background-color: tan; border-radius: 6px;">&nbsp;highlighted in tan&nbsp;</span> and are from the <u>old</u> premium liabilities reading. You should ignore the calculation portion of these problems.
 +
 
 +
{| class='wikitable'
 +
|-
 +
| Questions held out from Fall 2019 exam: '''#14'''. ''(Skip these now to have a fresh exam to practice on later. For links to these questions, see [[Exam Summaries]].)''
 +
|}
  
 
: {| class='wikitable' style='width: 1000px;'
 
: {| class='wikitable' style='width: 1000px;'
Line 24: Line 29:
 
|-
 
|-
 
! style='width: 175px;' | reference !! style='width: 175px;' | part (a) !! style='width: 175px;' | part (b) !! style='width: 175px;' | part (c) !! part (d)
 
! style='width: 175px;' | reference !! style='width: 175px;' | part (a) !! style='width: 175px;' | part (b) !! style='width: 175px;' | part (c) !! part (d)
 +
 +
|- style="border-bottom: 2px solid;"
 +
|| [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2019_1-Spring)/(2019_1-Spring)_(14)_v2.pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style="color: red;">'''(2019.Spring #14)'''</span>
 +
|| '''premium liabilities''': <br> - calculate <span style="color: red;"><sup>'''6'''</sup></span><sup>,</sup> <span style="color: red;"><sup>'''6a'''</sup></span>
 +
|| <span style='color: green;'>'''DPAE/PDR:'''</span> <br> - calculate
 +
|| '''effect on ROE''': <br> - when DPAE is reduced
 +
|| '''(d)''' loss ratio projections <br> '''(e)''' [[OSFI.MCT]]
  
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|| [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2018_2-Fall)/(2018_2-Fall)_(26).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2018.Fall #26)'''</span>
 +
|| [[CIA.MfAD]]
 +
|| [[OSFI.MCT]]
 +
|| <span style='color: green;'>'''DPAE/PDR:'''</span> <br> - interpretation
 +
|| [[OSFI.MCT]]
 +
 +
|- style="border-bottom: 2px solid;"
 
|| [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2018_1-Spring)/(2018_1-Spring)_(14).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2018.Spring #14)'''</span>
 
|| [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2018_1-Spring)/(2018_1-Spring)_(14).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2018.Spring #14)'''</span>
 
|| <span style='color: green;'>'''DPAE/PDR:'''</span> <br> - calculate <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>4</sup>'''</span>
 
|| <span style='color: green;'>'''DPAE/PDR:'''</span> <br> - calculate <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>4</sup>'''</span>
Line 39: Line 58:
 
| style="background-color: lightgrey" |
 
| style="background-color: lightgrey" |
  
|-
+
|- style="border-bottom: 2px solid;"
 
|| [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2017_1-Spring)/(2017_1-Spring)_(15).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2017.Spring #15)'''</span>
 
|| [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2017_1-Spring)/(2017_1-Spring)_(15).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2017.Spring #15)'''</span>
 
|| <span style='color: green;'>'''DPAE/PDR:'''</span> <br> - calculate <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>5</sup>'''</span>
 
|| <span style='color: green;'>'''DPAE/PDR:'''</span> <br> - calculate <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>5</sup>'''</span>
Line 60: Line 79:
 
|| '''(e)''' UPR liabilities<br> '''(f)''' see [[OSFI.AA]]
 
|| '''(e)''' UPR liabilities<br> '''(f)''' see [[OSFI.AA]]
  
|-
+
|- style="border-bottom: 2px solid;"
 
|| [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2016_1-Spring)/(2016_1-Spring)_(13).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2016.Spring #13)'''</span>
 
|| [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2016_1-Spring)/(2016_1-Spring)_(13).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2016.Spring #13)'''</span>
 
|| '''calculate''': <br> - durations <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>2,3</sup>'''</span>
 
|| '''calculate''': <br> - durations <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>2,3</sup>'''</span>
Line 74: Line 93:
 
| style="background-color: lightgrey" |
 
| style="background-color: lightgrey" |
  
|-
+
|- style="border-bottom: 2px solid;"
 
|| [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2015_1-Spring)/(2015_1-Spring)_(28).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2015.Spring #28)'''</span>
 
|| [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2015_1-Spring)/(2015_1-Spring)_(28).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2015.Spring #28)'''</span>
 
| style="background-color: tan" | <span style='color: green;'>'''DPAE/PDR:'''</span> <br> - outdated
 
| style="background-color: tan" | <span style='color: green;'>'''DPAE/PDR:'''</span> <br> - outdated
Line 88: Line 107:
 
| style="background-color: tan" |
 
| style="background-color: tan" |
  
|-
+
|- style="border-bottom: 2px solid;"
 
|| [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2014_1-Spring)/(2014_1-Spring)_(19).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2014.Spring #19)'''</span>
 
|| [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2014_1-Spring)/(2014_1-Spring)_(19).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2014.Spring #19)'''</span>
 
| style="background-color: tan" | <span style='color: green;'>'''DPAE/PDR:'''</span> <br> - outdated
 
| style="background-color: tan" | <span style='color: green;'>'''DPAE/PDR:'''</span> <br> - outdated
Line 102: Line 121:
 
| style="background-color: tan" |
 
| style="background-color: tan" |
  
|-
+
|- style="border-bottom: 2px solid;"
 
|| [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2013_2-Fall)/(2013_2-Fall)_(20).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2013.Fall #20)'''</span>
 
|| [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2013_2-Fall)/(2013_2-Fall)_(20).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2013.Fall #20)'''</span>
 
| style="background-color: tan" | <span style='color: green;'>'''DPAE/PDR:'''</span> <br> - outdated
 
| style="background-color: tan" | <span style='color: green;'>'''DPAE/PDR:'''</span> <br> - outdated
Line 119: Line 138:
  
 
: <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>1</sup>'''</span> This is the <span style="background-color: yellow;">first time</span> the examiner's report used the duration method from the 2016 version of the source reading.
 
: <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>1</sup>'''</span> This is the <span style="background-color: yellow;">first time</span> the examiner's report used the duration method from the 2016 version of the source reading.
: <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>2</sup>'''</span> Uses the pre-2016 version of the duration calculation. '''Do not use this method'''. This is explained in detail in the wiki article.
+
: <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>2</sup>'''</span> Uses the pre-2016 version of the duration calculation. '''Do not use this method'''. This is explained in detail in the wiki article. The duration calculation using the <u>new method</u> is in ''[https://www.battleactsmain.ca/vanillaforum/discussion/373/spring-2016-13 this forum thread]''.
 
: <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>3</sup>'''</span> Part of a larger MCT problem ''(see [[OSFI.MCT]])''
 
: <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>3</sup>'''</span> Part of a larger MCT problem ''(see [[OSFI.MCT]])''
: <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>4</sup>'''</span> There is not enough information provided to solve this problem. They do not provide the '''interest rate shock'''. The first sample answer in the examiner's report uses 1.25% but you could not have known this ''(and they did not mention the omission in their solution.)'' The second sample answer assumes the interest rate shock equals MfAD(inv). This is ''not'' a valid assumption, but it's the only way you could solve the problem.
+
: <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>4</sup>'''</span> There is not enough information provided to solve this problem. They do not provide the '''interest rate shock'''. The first sample answer in the examiner's report uses 1.25% but you could not have known this ''(and they did not mention the omission in their solution.)'' The second sample answer assumes the interest rate shock equals MfAD(inv). This is ''not'' a valid assumption, but it's the only way you could solve the problem. '''See also''': ''[https://battleactsmain.ca/vanillaforum/discussion/476/2018-spring-q14 maintenance expenses in sample answer 1]''.
: <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>5</sup>'''</span> The solution in the examiner's report refers to an outdated version of this reading. See [[CIA.PrLiabs#Explanation_of_2017.Spring_.2315a | here]] for a solution using the current method.
+
: <span style="color: red;">'''<sup>5</sup>'''</span> The solution in the examiner's report refers to an outdated version of this reading. See ''[[CIA.PrLiabs#Explanation_of_2017.Spring_Q15a | here]]'' for a solution using the current method.
 +
: <span style="color: red;"><sup>'''6'''</sup></span> The source text seems to define ''policy liabilities associated with the UPR'' and ''premium liabilities'' as being the same thing. The CAS however has communicated to me that they are not the same, although they provided no explanation. This wiki article treats them as if they are indeed the same.
 +
: <span style="color: red;"><sup>'''6a'''</sup></span> There is an error in the examiner's report solution. In the PV calculation, they wrote (<u>0.6</u> x 1.03<sup>‐0.5</sup> + <u>0.4</u> x 1.03<sup>‐1.5</sup>) x 1.03<sup>(0.5‐1/3)</sup>, but the 0.6 and 0.4 are reversed. Their final answer is correct but they '''should have written''' (<u>0.4</u> x 1.03<sup>‐0.5</sup> + <u>0.6</u> x 1.03<sup>‐1.5</sup>) x 1.03<sup>(0.5‐1/3)</sup>. &nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="color: green;">&larr; ''shout-out to WG!''</span>
  
 
==In Plain English!==
 
==In Plain English!==
Line 140: Line 161:
 
* purpose of DPAE asset
 
* purpose of DPAE asset
  
[https://www.battleactsmain.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=CIA&suffix=PrLiabs&section=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=1<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: aqua; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''mini BattleQuiz 1]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.''' </span>
+
[https://battleactsmain.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=CIA&suffix=PrLiabs&section=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=1<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: aqua; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''mini BattleQuiz 1]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.''' </span>
  
 
===The Calculation===
 
===The Calculation===
Line 158: Line 179:
 
: '''Section 4:''' Discusses 'Other Net Liabilities', namely commission & premium adjustments. You might want to know the definitions of these, but my guess it that it's too detailed to be asked on the exam. <span style='color: brown;'>''If you've covered everything else and need something to do, you can read this section!''</span>
 
: '''Section 4:''' Discusses 'Other Net Liabilities', namely commission & premium adjustments. You might want to know the definitions of these, but my guess it that it's too detailed to be asked on the exam. <span style='color: brown;'>''If you've covered everything else and need something to do, you can read this section!''</span>
 
: '''Section 5:''' Subsequent events. This is a brief review of the ice-storm example from the [[CIA.Subseq]]. '''Skip it.''' It's all covered in [[CIA.Subseq]].
 
: '''Section 5:''' Subsequent events. This is a brief review of the ice-storm example from the [[CIA.Subseq]]. '''Skip it.''' It's all covered in [[CIA.Subseq]].
 
Before looking at the old exam problem in the next section, review this next mini BattleQuiz a few times. It's an easy version of the DPAE calculation that was covered in Boot Camp.
 
 
[https://www.battleactsmain.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=CIA&suffix=PrLiabs&section=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=2<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: aqua; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''mini BattleQuiz 2]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.''' </span>
 
  
 
<hr>
 
<hr>
Line 168: Line 185:
  
 
I don't like the way the examiner's report presented the solution to this problem. Below is a more organized way of understanding how to solve it.
 
I don't like the way the examiner's report presented the solution to this problem. Below is a more organized way of understanding how to solve it.
 +
 +
:{| class="wikitable" style="background-color: gold; font-size: 16px; width: 625px;"
 +
|-
 +
| '''Important''': There is an inconsistency regarding the formula for '''PolLiabs(UPR)''' in the source text that's explained in ''[https://www.battleactsmain.ca/vanillaforum/discussion/254/2014-fall-25-contingent-commission comment #3 of this forum post]''. See also the formula for PolLiabs(UPR) further down. ''<span style="color: green;">(shout-out to AC!)''</span>
 +
|}
  
 
====Question====
 
====Question====
Line 177: Line 199:
 
::{| class='wikitable' style='text-align: left'
 
::{| class='wikitable' style='text-align: left'
 
|-  
 
|-  
|style='background-color: lightgreen;' | year          || style='background-color: lightgreen; text-align: center' | 2016
+
|style='background-color: lightgreen;' | year-end           || style='background-color: lightgreen; text-align: center' | Dec 31, 2014
 
|-  
 
|-  
 
|style='background-color:' | net UPR                    || style='background-color: lightgrey; text-align: right' | 69,580
 
|style='background-color:' | net UPR                    || style='background-color: lightgrey; text-align: right' | 69,580
Line 183: Line 205:
 
|style='background-color:' | FutRe (Future Reinsurance) || style='background-color: lightgrey; text-align: right' | 4,260
 
|style='background-color:' | FutRe (Future Reinsurance) || style='background-color: lightgrey; text-align: right' | 4,260
 
|-  
 
|-  
|style='background-color:' | ELR ''(<u>un</u>discounted)'' || style='background-color: lightgrey; text-align: center' | 98%
+
|style='background-color:' | ELR ''(<u>un</u>discounted)'' for 2015 || style='background-color: lightgrey; text-align: center' | 98%
 
|-  
 
|-  
 
|style='background-color:' | ULAE                      || style='background-color: lightgrey; text-align: right' | 3,160
 
|style='background-color:' | ULAE                      || style='background-color: lightgrey; text-align: right' | 3,160
Line 242: Line 264:
 
:{| class='wikitable' style='text-align: left'
 
:{| class='wikitable' style='text-align: left'
 
|-  
 
|-  
| <span style='color: red;'>'''PolLiabs(UPR)'''</span> = <span style='color: purple;'>'''APV'''</span> + <span style='color: green;'>'''FutRe'''</span> + <span style='color: green;'>'''maint'''</span>
+
| <span style='color: red;'>'''PolLiabs(UPR)'''</span> = <span style='color: purple;'>'''APV'''</span> + <span style='color: green;'>'''FutRe'''</span> + <span style='color: green;'>'''maint'''</span> + contingent commissions<sup>*</sup>
 
|}
 
|}
  
Again, we know 2 of the 3 items in this formula:
+
: <sup>*</sup> ''The term for "contingent commissions" is left out of the formula described on page 5 of the source text, but it '''should be included''' to be consistent with the formula provided in Appendix B, Sheet 3 of the corresponding Excel exhibits.''
 +
 
 +
Again, we know 2 of the items in this formula: ''(contingent commissions are not given so we'll assume they are 0)''
  
 
: <span style='color: green;'>'''FutRe'''</span> = 4,260
 
: <span style='color: green;'>'''FutRe'''</span> = 4,260
 
: <span style='color: green;'>'''maint'''</span> = 4,175
 
: <span style='color: green;'>'''maint'''</span> = 4,175
  
''We're really cooking!'' In fact, it looks like we're almost done, but unfortunately, calculating <span style='color: purple;'>'''APV'''</span> is the hardest part.
+
''We're really cooking!'' In fact, it looks like we're almost done, but unfortunately, calculating <span style='color: purple;'>'''APV'''</span> is the hardest part. Before getting to that however, here's an easier quiz problem to get you started:
 +
 
 +
[https://battleactsmain.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=CIA&suffix=PrLiabs&section=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=2<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: aqua; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''mini BattleQuiz 2]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.''' </span>
  
 
====Calculating APV====
 
====Calculating APV====
Line 264: Line 290:
 
|-  
 
|-  
 
| '''PV =''' [ ( <span style='color: green;'>'''UPR - FutRe'''</span> ) <span style='color: green;'>'''x ELR + ULAE'''</span> ] <span style='color: red;'>'''x PVfctr'''</span>
 
| '''PV =''' [ ( <span style='color: green;'>'''UPR - FutRe'''</span> ) <span style='color: green;'>'''x ELR + ULAE'''</span> ] <span style='color: red;'>'''x PVfctr'''</span>
 +
|}
 +
 +
:{| class='wikitable'
 +
|-
 +
|| '''Special BattleActs Tip''': We are calculating <u>net PV</u> with the above formula but it also works for <u>grossPV</u> except you use gross UPR & set FutRe = 0.
 
|}
 
|}
  
Line 356: Line 387:
 
Once you've got the above table, the '''Macaulay duration''' calculation is easy: ''(This is not part of the DPAE calculation, but it's related, so I've included it here as well. The duration calculation is discussed in detail in [[CIA.Duration]].)''
 
Once you've got the above table, the '''Macaulay duration''' calculation is easy: ''(This is not part of the DPAE calculation, but it's related, so I've included it here as well. The duration calculation is discussed in detail in [[CIA.Duration]].)''
  
: '''Step 1''': Take the SUMPRODUCT of columns (2) and (6) DIVIDED by the SUM of column (6) to get '''1.9616''' ''(This is the same method as for claim liabilities.)''
+
: '''Step 1''': Take the SUMPRODUCT of columns (2) and (6) DIVIDED by the SUM of column (6) to get '''1.9630'''
:: ''(It's the <u>weighted average</u> of the time from column (2) where the <u>weights</u> are the PV factors from column (6))''
+
:: ''&rarr; It's the <u>weighted average</u> of the time from column (2) where the <u>weights</u> are the PV factors from column (6)''
 +
:: ''&rarr; The idea of using the payment pattern to allocate unpaid amounts to future payment periods is the same as for claim liabilities. Note however the timing difference: For claim liabilities, we start with the unpaid amount at 12 months whereas for premium liabilities, we start with the unpaid amount at 0 months.'' <span style="color: green;">''&larr; shout-out to jyjk0519!''</span>
  
 
: '''Step 2:''' This is an <u>extra step</u> in the duration calculation for the premium liabilities to adjust for the FAD (Future Accident Date). It's easy, just <u>subtract</u> (0.5 - 0.3333):
 
: '''Step 2:''' This is an <u>extra step</u> in the duration calculation for the premium liabilities to adjust for the FAD (Future Accident Date). It's easy, just <u>subtract</u> (0.5 - 0.3333):
 
::The final '''Macaulay duration''' is:  
 
::The final '''Macaulay duration''' is:  
  
::: 1.9616 - (0.5 - .3333) = '''1.7949'''
+
::: 1.9630 - (0.5 - .3333) = '''1.7963'''
  
 
:: And the '''modified duration''' is:
 
:: And the '''modified duration''' is:
  
::: 1.7949 / (1.03) = '''1.7426'''
+
::: 1.7963 / (1.03) = '''1.7440''' &nbsp; <span style="color: green;">''(shout-out to RI!)''</span>
  
 
''Now you're ready to tackle the harder version of the DPAE problem.''
 
''Now you're ready to tackle the harder version of the DPAE problem.''
  
[https://www.battleactsmain.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=CIA&suffix=PrLiabs&section=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=3<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: aqua; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''mini BattleQuiz 3]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.''' </span>
+
[https://battleactsmain.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=CIA&suffix=PrLiabs&section=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=3<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: aqua; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''mini BattleQuiz 3]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.''' </span>
  
 
====2016.Fall #15 Redone====
 
====2016.Fall #15 Redone====
Line 384: Line 416:
 
<hr>
 
<hr>
  
===Explanation of 2017.Spring #15a===
+
===Explanation of 2017.Spring Q15a===
  
 
This is very similar to '''2015.Fall #12''' above. The only '''extra step''' is calculating <u>gross PV(L+LAE)</u>. ''('''In 2015.Fall''', you were given this value directly.)'' To do this, apply the PV formula, but since we're calculating <u>gross</u> of reinsurance, we set FutRe = 0. ''(Note that we're not given a value for ULAE so we assume it's 0.)''
 
This is very similar to '''2015.Fall #12''' above. The only '''extra step''' is calculating <u>gross PV(L+LAE)</u>. ''('''In 2015.Fall''', you were given this value directly.)'' To do this, apply the PV formula, but since we're calculating <u>gross</u> of reinsurance, we set FutRe = 0. ''(Note that we're not given a value for ULAE so we assume it's 0.)''
Line 397: Line 429:
 
The rest of the problem is the same as 2015.Fall. You try this problem on your own. Note that a DPAE problem appears on almost every exam. Unfortunately the methodology was changed a couple of years ago and most of the old exam problems are no longer relevant.
 
The rest of the problem is the same as 2015.Fall. You try this problem on your own. Note that a DPAE problem appears on almost every exam. Unfortunately the methodology was changed a couple of years ago and most of the old exam problems are no longer relevant.
  
[https://www.battleactsmain.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=CIA&suffix=PrLiabs&section=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=4<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: aqua; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''mini BattleQuiz 4]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.''' </span>
+
As noted footnote <span style="color: red;"><sup>'''5'''</sup></span> in the BattleTable at the top of the page, the solution in the examiner's report is based on an outdated version of the reading. Actually, most of it is fine, but table where they put all the pieces together is confusing. Here's my solution:
 +
 
 +
:{| class='wikitable' style='text-align: left'
 +
|-
 +
| <strong>DPAE =</strong> <span style='color: green; font-weight: 700;'>UPR</span> <span style='color: red;'>'''- PolLiabs(UPR)'''</span> + <span style='color: green; font-weight: 700;'>UEComm</span>
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
:: UPR = '''2,700''' ''(given)''
 +
:: PolLiabs(UPR) = '''2,180.67''' ''(calculated below)''
 +
:: UEComm = '''250''' ''(given)''
 +
 
 +
:{| class='wikitable' style='text-align: left'
 +
|-
 +
| <span style='color: red;'>'''PolLiabs(UPR)'''</span> = <span style='color: purple;'>'''APV'''</span> + <span style='color: green;'>'''FutRe'''</span> + <span style='color: green;'>'''maint'''</span>
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
:: APV = '''1605.67''' ''(that part of the examiner's report solution was correct)''
 +
:: FutRe = '''500''' ''(given)''
 +
:: maint = 2.5% x 3,000 = '''75'''
 +
 
 +
This calculates to <u>2,180.67</u> as stated above, so the final answer is '''DPAE''' = 2,700 - 2,180.67 + 250 = '''769.33'''.
 +
 
 +
[https://battleactsmain.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=CIA&suffix=PrLiabs&section=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=4<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: aqua; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''mini BattleQuiz 4]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.''' </span>
  
 
===Maintenance Expenses===
 
===Maintenance Expenses===
Line 403: Line 457:
 
A lot of people have asked about the discounting of maintenance expenses in the DPAE calculation. There are 2 forum threads on this topic, but the short answer is that you '''do not''' have to discount maintenance expenses. The confusion is that sometimes the examiner's reports '''do''' discount them ''(see <span style="color: red;">'''2016.Spring Q13'''</span>)'' and sometimes they don't ''(see sample answer 2 for <span style="color: red;">'''2018.Spring #14'''</span>)''. The Excel exhibits for the most recent version of the CIA's premium liability paper '''do not''' discount maintenance expenses.
 
A lot of people have asked about the discounting of maintenance expenses in the DPAE calculation. There are 2 forum threads on this topic, but the short answer is that you '''do not''' have to discount maintenance expenses. The confusion is that sometimes the examiner's reports '''do''' discount them ''(see <span style="color: red;">'''2016.Spring Q13'''</span>)'' and sometimes they don't ''(see sample answer 2 for <span style="color: red;">'''2018.Spring #14'''</span>)''. The Excel exhibits for the most recent version of the CIA's premium liability paper '''do not''' discount maintenance expenses.
  
* [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/vanillaforum/discussion/142/maintenance-expenses-discounting#latest discounting thread 1]
+
* ''[https://www.battleactsmain.ca/vanillaforum/discussion/142/maintenance-expenses-discounting#latest discounting thread 1]''
* [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/vanillaforum/discussion/comment/97/#Comment_97 discounting thread 2]
+
* ''[https://www.battleactsmain.ca/vanillaforum/discussion/comment/97/#Comment_97 discounting thread 2]''
 +
 
 +
Note however that the Excel exhibits for the ''[[CIA.Duration]]'' reading do illustrate the discounting procedure for the maintenance expenses. <span style="color: green;">''(shout-out to sidsim!)''</span>
 +
 
 +
* ''[https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/CIA.Dur_Excel_Exhibits.xlsx Excel file showing discounting maintenance expenses]''
 +
 
 +
''(I believe you should still be o.k. not discounting the maintenance expenses though.)''
  
 
==BattleCodes==
 
==BattleCodes==
Line 420: Line 480:
 
<span style='color:purple'>'''''Expect 2-3 pts from this paper on the exam'''''</span>
 
<span style='color:purple'>'''''Expect 2-3 pts from this paper on the exam'''''</span>
  
[https://www.battleactsmain.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=CIA&suffix=PrLiabs&section=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=all<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: lightgreen; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''Full BattleQuiz]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.''' </span>
+
[https://battleactsmain.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=CIA&suffix=PrLiabs&section=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=all<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: lightgreen; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''Full BattleQuiz]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.''' </span>
  
 
&nbsp;&nbsp;[https://www.battleactsmain.ca/vanillaforum/categories/cia-accting<span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: lightgrey; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 0px;">'''Forum'''</span>]
 
&nbsp;&nbsp;[https://www.battleactsmain.ca/vanillaforum/categories/cia-accting<span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: lightgrey; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 0px;">'''Forum'''</span>]

Latest revision as of 13:14, 27 September 2021

The most complex computational problem on the syllabus is calculating APV(premium liabilities) and DPAE/PDR.
It is NOT the same as calculating APV(claims liabilities).   Forum

Pop Quiz

Given a discount rate of 5%, calculate APV(claims liabilities) for $10,000 of payments made during the 12-mth development period. (When calculating APV for claims liabilities, we assume payments are made in the middle of the year, so the discounting period for 12-mths would be 0.5 yrs)

BattleTable

Based on past exams, the main things you need to know (in rough order of importance) are:

  • DPAE/PDR: calculation, interpretation (DPAE = Deferred Policy Acquisition Expense, PDR = Premium Deficiency Reserve)
  • durations of premium liabilities (usually part of a larger MCT problem)
  • definition of the DPAE asset
  • components of the policy liabilities in connection with the UPR (Unearned Premium Reserve)

Top Questions ← Questions you absolutely need to know!

Important: Questions from 2015.Spring and prior are  highlighted in tan  and are from the old premium liabilities reading. You should ignore the calculation portion of these problems.

Questions held out from Fall 2019 exam: #14. (Skip these now to have a fresh exam to practice on later. For links to these questions, see Exam Summaries.)
reference part (a) part (b) part (c) part (d)
E (2019.Spring #14) premium liabilities:
- calculate 6, 6a
DPAE/PDR:
- calculate
effect on ROE:
- when DPAE is reduced
(d) loss ratio projections
(e) OSFI.MCT
E (2018.Fall #26) CIA.MfAD OSFI.MCT DPAE/PDR:
- interpretation
OSFI.MCT
E (2018.Spring #14) DPAE/PDR:
- calculate 4
E (2017.Fall #15) DPAE/PDR:
- calculate 1
E (2017.Spring #15) DPAE/PDR:
- calculate 5
PDR:
- does it exist
E (2016.Fall #15) calculate:
- durations 2,3
see OSFI.MCT
E (2016.Fall #27) see OSFI.AA see OSFI.AA (c) see OSFI.AA
(d) see OSFI.AA
(e) UPR liabilities
(f) see OSFI.AA
E (2016.Spring #13) calculate:
- durations 2,3
see OSFI.MCT
E (2015.Fall #12) DPAE/PDR:
- calculate 2
E (2015.Spring #28) DPAE/PDR:
- outdated
E (2014.Fall #25) DPAE/PDR:
- outdated
define:
- DPAE (+ example)
E (2014.Spring #19) DPAE/PDR:
- outdated
E (2013.Fall #17) DPAE/PDR:
- outdated
E (2013.Fall #20) DPAE/PDR:
- outdated
concept:
- order of operations
E (2012.Fall #26) DPAE/PDR:
- outdated
1 This is the first time the examiner's report used the duration method from the 2016 version of the source reading.
2 Uses the pre-2016 version of the duration calculation. Do not use this method. This is explained in detail in the wiki article. The duration calculation using the new method is in this forum thread.
3 Part of a larger MCT problem (see OSFI.MCT)
4 There is not enough information provided to solve this problem. They do not provide the interest rate shock. The first sample answer in the examiner's report uses 1.25% but you could not have known this (and they did not mention the omission in their solution.) The second sample answer assumes the interest rate shock equals MfAD(inv). This is not a valid assumption, but it's the only way you could solve the problem. See also: maintenance expenses in sample answer 1.
5 The solution in the examiner's report refers to an outdated version of this reading. See here for a solution using the current method.
6 The source text seems to define policy liabilities associated with the UPR and premium liabilities as being the same thing. The CAS however has communicated to me that they are not the same, although they provided no explanation. This wiki article treats them as if they are indeed the same.
6a There is an error in the examiner's report solution. In the PV calculation, they wrote (0.6 x 1.03‐0.5 + 0.4 x 1.03‐1.5) x 1.03(0.5‐1/3), but the 0.6 and 0.4 are reversed. Their final answer is correct but they should have written (0.4 x 1.03‐0.5 + 0.6 x 1.03‐1.5) x 1.03(0.5‐1/3).    shout-out to WG!

In Plain English!

Intro

Focus on the appendices! The appendices are printouts of Excel spreadsheets that show you how to calculate the APV of the premium liabilities. Other than that, there are just a few simple definitions & concepts. (These are covered in the BattleCards.)

Source Readings: BattleActs covers all material from past exams. It also covers significant material that has not appeared on past exams but that I've judged to be important. Still, it's a good idea to spend at least little time reviewing the source readings. You may have a different opinion on what's important and what you can skip. You cannot read all 2,500 pages in depth, but BattleActs give you the necessary background knowledge so that the time you do spend on the source readings will be much more efficient.

Concepts

  • components of UPR (Unearned Premium Reserve)
  • definition of DPAE asset
  • purpose of DPAE asset

mini BattleQuiz 1 You must be logged in or this will not work.

The Calculation

It is not that easy to learn this calculation from the appendices. There is a calculational problem template in BattleActs that explains it more concisely.

Don't do it now, but at some point, go over Appendix B, Sheet 5 from the Excel exhibits.

  • This explains how to calculate the discount factor for premium liabilities.
  • Note that this calculation was greatly simplified in the 2016 update of this paper. You will see the old version of the discount factor calculation in examiners reports for 2016.Fall and prior. (Sometimes they're nice and give you the discount factor, as in 2017.Spring #15a)

Overview of the 5 Sections in the Paper

For the sake of completeness, here is a brief summary of each section of the paper:

Section 1: General definitions. Just memorize the BattleCards.
Section 2: A discussion of familiar pricing concepts related to the DPAE/PDR calc. Skip it. The vital info is in the appendices and the BattleActs calculational problems.
Section 3: Basic formulas for 'max DPAE' and 'PDR'. Again, the vital info is in the appendices and the BattleActs calculational problems.
Section 4: Discusses 'Other Net Liabilities', namely commission & premium adjustments. You might want to know the definitions of these, but my guess it that it's too detailed to be asked on the exam. If you've covered everything else and need something to do, you can read this section!
Section 5: Subsequent events. This is a brief review of the ice-storm example from the CIA.Subseq. Skip it. It's all covered in CIA.Subseq.

Explanation of 2015.Fall #12

I don't like the way the examiner's report presented the solution to this problem. Below is a more organized way of understanding how to solve it.

Important: There is an inconsistency regarding the formula for PolLiabs(UPR) in the source text that's explained in comment #3 of this forum post. See also the formula for PolLiabs(UPR) further down. (shout-out to AC!)

Question

Calculate the max allowable DPAE and the premium deficiency, if any. Link to the official question and answer from the examiner's report:  E (2015.Fall #12)

Given Information

year-end Dec 31, 2014
net UPR 69,580
FutRe (Future Reinsurance) 4,260
ELR (undiscounted) for 2015 98%
ULAE 3,160
DiscntRt 3.0%
MfAD(inv) 50 bps
MfAD(clms) 10.0%
MfAD(re) 1.0%
gross PV(L+LAE) 68,260
maintenance 4,175
UEComm (Unearned Commission) 1,045

Accident year payment pattern: (Assume all payments are made in the middle of the year)

age CumPd
12 25%
24 50%
36 75%
48 100%

Whew! That's a lot to take in! But if you're organized, it all fits neatly into the formulas.

Basic Formulas

We're asked to calculate DPAE, so let's start with the basic formula: (All quantities below are net unless it specifically says gross or ceded.)

DPAE = UPR - PolLiabs(UPR) + UEComm

Notice that we already know 2 of the 3 items in this formula:

UPR = 69,580
UEComm = 1,045.

Great start! Now, since the missing piece in the above formula is PolLiabs(UPR), let's write down the formula for that: (PolLiabs is short for policy liabilities.)

PolLiabs(UPR) = APV + FutRe + maint + contingent commissions*
* The term for "contingent commissions" is left out of the formula described on page 5 of the source text, but it should be included to be consistent with the formula provided in Appendix B, Sheet 3 of the corresponding Excel exhibits.

Again, we know 2 of the items in this formula: (contingent commissions are not given so we'll assume they are 0)

FutRe = 4,260
maint = 4,175

We're really cooking! In fact, it looks like we're almost done, but unfortunately, calculating APV is the hardest part. Before getting to that however, here's an easier quiz problem to get you started:

mini BattleQuiz 2 You must be logged in or this will not work.

Calculating APV

You know from the MfAD paper that to calculate APV, we first need the plain old PV at two different discount rates:

  • the given discount rate of 3.0%
  • the modified discount rate that takes into account MfAD(inv) or 3.0% - 50bps = 2.5%

The PV formula is:

PV = [ ( UPR - FutRe ) x ELR + ULAE ] x PVfctr
Special BattleActs Tip: We are calculating net PV with the above formula but it also works for grossPV except you use gross UPR & set FutRe = 0.

If we fill the known (green) items, we get: (Note that PVfctr = present value factor.)

PV = 67,174 x PVfctr

But how do we calculate the PVfctr? This is a long calculation that we'll leave for later. For now, I'll just tell you what the PVfctrs are at the two discount rates:

PVfctr(@3.0%) = 0.9533    ← obtained using old method (with interpolation) to be consistent with examiner's report
PVfctr(@2.5%) = 0.9607    ← obtained using old method (with interpolation) to be consistent with examiner's report

Then just multiply 67,174 by each factor to get:

PV(@3.0%) = 64,034
PV(@2.5%) = 64,536     (Recall, a lower discount rate produces a higher PV)

Finally, we have almost all the pieces we need to calculate the APV:

APV = [PV(@2.5%)] + MfAD(clms) x [PV(@3.0%)] + MfAD(re) x [ceded PV(@3.0%)]

You just need to use the given value of gross PV(@3.0%) to get:

ceded PV(@3.0%)
= gross PV(@3.0%) – net PV(@3.0%)
= 68,260 - 64,034
= 4,226

Substituting all values into the APV formula above gives:

APV
= 64,536 + 10.0% x 64,034 + 1.0% x 4,226
= 70,981

Putting it all together

Now it's just a matter of working your way back up. Using APV = 70,981 we calculate:

PolLiabs(UPR)
= 70,981 + 4,260 + 4,175
= 79,416

Then:

DPAE
= 69,580 - 79,416 + 1,045
= -8,791
But since the result is negative, there is no DPAE. Rather we have a premium deficiency reserve of 8,791.

Calculating the Present Value Factors - Ugh!! (NEW version without interpolation)

This is the PVfctr (Present Value Factor) calculation (discount factor) for the NEW 2016 version of the premium liability reading. It's easier than the old version. The answers here will be different than in the examiner's report, and different from what was stated in the solution above. If you have to calculate the Pvfctr on the exam, you should use the following method:

  • In the solution above, we used the PVfctrs calculated using the old version to be consistent with the examiner's report. But if you get a similar problem on a subsequent exam, you'll have to use the method in the Premium Liabilities Excel Exhibit Appendix B, Sheet 5 (GrossMisc tab)
  • Recall from above: discount rate = 3.0%, discount rate with MfAD = 2.5%
APD CumPd IncrPd setup for PVfctr setup for PVfctr w/ MfAD
(2) (3) (4) (6) = (4) / 1.03(2) (9) = (4) / 1.025(2)
0.5 25% 25% 24.63% 24.69%
1.5 50% 25% 23.92% 24.09%
2.5 75% 25% 23.22% 23.50%
3.5 100% 25% 22.54% 22.93%
(10) Total = 0.9431 (10) Total = 0.9521

It appears from Appendix B, Sheet 5, that row (11) will always be 0.5, and row (12) will always be 1/3 or 0.3333. Then PVfctr = (10) x DiscRt ^ [(11) - (12)]:

PVfctr for 3.0% = 0.9431 x (1.030)(0.5 - 0.3333) = 0.9477
PVfctr for 2.5% = 0.9521 x (1.025)(0.5 - 0.3333) = 0.9560

(Note that the PVfctrs calculated using the new version (without interpolation) are slightly smaller than the result using the old method.)

Duration of Premium Liabilities

Once you've got the above table, the Macaulay duration calculation is easy: (This is not part of the DPAE calculation, but it's related, so I've included it here as well. The duration calculation is discussed in detail in CIA.Duration.)

Step 1: Take the SUMPRODUCT of columns (2) and (6) DIVIDED by the SUM of column (6) to get 1.9630
→ It's the weighted average of the time from column (2) where the weights are the PV factors from column (6)
→ The idea of using the payment pattern to allocate unpaid amounts to future payment periods is the same as for claim liabilities. Note however the timing difference: For claim liabilities, we start with the unpaid amount at 12 months whereas for premium liabilities, we start with the unpaid amount at 0 months. ← shout-out to jyjk0519!
Step 2: This is an extra step in the duration calculation for the premium liabilities to adjust for the FAD (Future Accident Date). It's easy, just subtract (0.5 - 0.3333):
The final Macaulay duration is:
1.9630 - (0.5 - .3333) = 1.7963
And the modified duration is:
1.7963 / (1.03) = 1.7440   (shout-out to RI!)

Now you're ready to tackle the harder version of the DPAE problem.

mini BattleQuiz 3 You must be logged in or this will not work.

2016.Fall #15 Redone

Before leaving this topic, let's take a quick look at the calculation of the PV factors and premium liability duration for E (2016.Fall #15)

This problem asked you to calculate the capital required for interest rate risk. As you now know, this long problem involves calculating the PV factors, and the duration of the premium liabilities, but the examiner's report is now outdated. It uses the old method of interpolation. If you had this problem on a subsequent exam, you would have to use the new method explained above.

Click the link 2016.Fall Q15 Redone to see that portion of the calculation redone with the new method.

The old (2016) version of the premium liability duration calculation is no longer relevant and has been archived to 2015.Fall Q12 Old Version.


Explanation of 2017.Spring Q15a

This is very similar to 2015.Fall #12 above. The only extra step is calculating gross PV(L+LAE). (In 2015.Fall, you were given this value directly.) To do this, apply the PV formula, but since we're calculating gross of reinsurance, we set FutRe = 0. (Note that we're not given a value for ULAE so we assume it's 0.)

PV = [ ( UPR - FutRe ) x ELR + ULAE ] x PVfctr

The result is: PV = (3,000 - 0) x 60% x 0.98 = 1,764

The rest of the problem is the same as 2015.Fall. You try this problem on your own. Note that a DPAE problem appears on almost every exam. Unfortunately the methodology was changed a couple of years ago and most of the old exam problems are no longer relevant.

As noted footnote 5 in the BattleTable at the top of the page, the solution in the examiner's report is based on an outdated version of the reading. Actually, most of it is fine, but table where they put all the pieces together is confusing. Here's my solution:

DPAE = UPR - PolLiabs(UPR) + UEComm
UPR = 2,700 (given)
PolLiabs(UPR) = 2,180.67 (calculated below)
UEComm = 250 (given)
PolLiabs(UPR) = APV + FutRe + maint
APV = 1605.67 (that part of the examiner's report solution was correct)
FutRe = 500 (given)
maint = 2.5% x 3,000 = 75

This calculates to 2,180.67 as stated above, so the final answer is DPAE = 2,700 - 2,180.67 + 250 = 769.33.

mini BattleQuiz 4 You must be logged in or this will not work.

Maintenance Expenses

A lot of people have asked about the discounting of maintenance expenses in the DPAE calculation. There are 2 forum threads on this topic, but the short answer is that you do not have to discount maintenance expenses. The confusion is that sometimes the examiner's reports do discount them (see 2016.Spring Q13) and sometimes they don't (see sample answer 2 for 2018.Spring #14). The Excel exhibits for the most recent version of the CIA's premium liability paper do not discount maintenance expenses.

Note however that the Excel exhibits for the CIA.Duration reading do illustrate the discounting procedure for the maintenance expenses. (shout-out to sidsim!)

(I believe you should still be o.k. not discounting the maintenance expenses though.)

BattleCodes

Memorize:

  • components of the policy liabilities connected to the UPR
  • defn of DPAE/PDR
  • purpose of DPAE asset

Calculational:

  • How to calculate DPAE/PDR

Expect 2-3 pts from this paper on the exam

Full BattleQuiz You must be logged in or this will not work.

  Forum

POP QUIZ ANSWERS

APV(ClmsLiabs) = 10,000 / 1.050.5 = 9,759