rlessard
About
- Username
- rlessard
- Joined
- Visits
- 40
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Ah ok thank you !
-
And another question regarding this topic: If we have more collaterals than capital required, is it true that we can decrease the margin for capital required down to 0 by (E+F+G+H) in excess of (A+B+C-D) ?
-
Ohhhhh I understand now ! Good point thank you
-
I am not sure to understand why this an if and only if statement. IFRS.17-53 effectively says "if, and only if" but when we look at the graph of decision, it looks like this is more a "or" condition (so first you need to look at the coverage period…
-
thank you !
-
Here is what I am talking about in p.12 of the source text.
-
Is this normal that in the source text (p.12), it is clearly written that: LRC = Premium received - DAC, where Premium received = UEP - Prem receivable ? We can consider that there is a typo in the source text ?
-
Hi ! I am not sure where you have seen: 1- Alberta (Non-Grid), Amending the Non-Grid RSP member transfer limit from 4% to 5%: It is not written in the Dutil text nor in the paper mentioned in the previous comment... Where have you seen this ?…
-
Thank you !
-
Battle Quiz 3 of CCIR section has an error in the solution. It always include Gross Investment income as a part on Net Investment Income (in addition of the Total Realized Gain on sale + Total fair value... + Dividends +...).