sample-25

for the earned premium, we divide by 2, it isn't because policies are written uniformly throughout the year?

for expected LR, why expected LC per policy / premium per policy? LC is losses/exposure, expected LC per policy / premium becomes losses/(exposure*premium)?

Comments

  • Yes to your first question
    For your second question, exposure is assumed to be 1 here so it drops out since you are looking prospectively whether the group of contract will be onerous over the next year

  • edited September 30

    Why ulae added at the end of calculation? I would calculate unpaid as "58M * (1+6%) - 30M" then discounted -> RA -> LIC. Answer key assuming no ULAE related to paid portion.......

  • Yup there's no ULAE related to the paid portion cause it would already have been incurred in the financials so no need to reserve for it
Sign In or Register to comment.